Difference between revisions of "Fong's Aurelia data"
From Ucsbgalaxy
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
log transformation. Data was still not normal, so I did a Mann Witney-U test. It was | log transformation. Data was still not normal, so I did a Mann Witney-U test. It was | ||
signifigant!!! Yay!!!! P-value is, like, 0.0212!!!! More on this later… | signifigant!!! Yay!!!! P-value is, like, 0.0212!!!! More on this later… | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Data are here [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0AkJuO1gYG12tdFZLc2pISThDUmVXUnpRUHg1bFRYOHc&single=true&gid=0&output=html]. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:31, 24 January 2012
I don't believe Cat sent the raw data, but sent summaries by email:
4/1/10
I just finished another set of trials with David Gold on the Aurelia polyps. The data looks really encouraging and I hope to be done soon. There is a trend that the polyps fire more nematocytes at lower light levels. The data needed to be log transformed to match the assumptions of normality; some animals fired in excess of 300 nematocytes!
4/5/10
Testing for the Aurelia is done!!! I did 20 trials for each treatment, got skewed data and did a log transformation. Data was still not normal, so I did a Mann Witney-U test. It was signifigant!!! Yay!!!! P-value is, like, 0.0212!!!! More on this later…
Data are here [1].
